Planning
Our approach
Define a bounded outcome and acceptance criteria, then refine the next increment from feedback.
What we account for
Dependencies and unfamiliar systems still need investigation.
We build fast by keeping senior engineers close to the decisions and putting AI to work across implementation, testing, and documentation. You try a working prototype in days, give us feedback, and see your project move toward launch in weeks.
The delivery loop
AI tools are part of the method. The other part is how we scope work, prepare context, review changes, and learn from each release. Engineers remain accountable throughout.
Feature walkthrough / JustPropertySearch
JustPropertySearch includes AI vacancy detection. Here is how that feature illustrates the scope, integration, and review questions in a HyperDev delivery loop.
01
The feature helps investors identify properties that may be vacant. The output must make sense within a property search, with uncertainty made clear.
02
Vacancy detection combines utility, mail, and imagery signals. Data handling, the API, and the interface need to work together.
03
A delivery review needs to cover missing data, uncertain results, access controls, and how the result appears to an investor.
The deliverable is an integrated feature.
Model output is one part of the work. The application also needs data access, a useful interface, error handling, and a release plan. This is why our engineers own the outcome across the stack.
These are choices about delivery, with practical constraints. We agree on the right approach for your project.
Our approach
Define a bounded outcome and acceptance criteria, then refine the next increment from feedback.
What we account for
Dependencies and unfamiliar systems still need investigation.
Our approach
Keep a small engineering team close to product decisions, with AI supporting implementation.
What we account for
Specialist expertise is brought in when the work requires it.
Our approach
Use AI to search and summarize relevant code while engineers verify the architecture.
What we account for
Reading a repository does not replace understanding the business.
Our approach
Review changes, run the agreed checks, demonstrate the result, and release in useful increments.
What we account for
Security, compliance, and operational requirements set the release conditions.
Before we start
The practical details of working with a team that uses AI to build software.
A prototype in days. A finished project in weeks. HyperDev combines a small senior team, AI-assisted implementation, and continuous review and testing to move quickly from an idea to launch. We agree on the project scope, integrations, and release requirements up front so you have a clear delivery timeline.
Send a brief description of your project or bottleneck. Within 48 hours, we’ll respond by email with initial architecture recommendations, questions that affect scope, and a suggested next step. If we need more context, we’ll explain what would help. You do not need to share a codebase to request an assessment.
Cost depends on the scope, existing systems, integrations, and release requirements. We use the assessment to identify a useful first increment, then provide a scoped proposal with deliverables, pricing, and a timeline before paid work begins.
Yes. We can take on a bounded feature or integration, help improve your development workflow, or build a new product. We review your conventions and constraints before recommending changes.
Experienced engineers review AI-generated changes. Automated tests and security checks support that review. We agree on acceptance criteria and the checks needed for your project; AI output alone is not a release decision.
We agree on data access, approved AI tools, and hosting requirements before using your material. Sensitive projects may need private-hosted models or limits on what context can be shared. We include those constraints in the implementation plan.
You own the code we build for your project, subject to third-party software licenses and the engagement terms. Handoff includes the documentation needed to run it. We agree on maintenance and support scope separately so responsibilities are clear.
We need a decision maker to confirm scope, access to relevant technical contacts, and feedback on working increments. The proposal sets out the review cadence and any dependencies on your team.
A clear first step
Tell us what you want to build or improve. We’ll respond by email within 48 hours with an initial technical assessment.